Monday, May 08, 2006

Months Supply Is Rising in Northern Vriginia

[Click on image for larger version]
[*Feel free to copy the image to other sites. Please credit. ]

As inventory has swelled across Northern Virginia (part of the Washington, DC metro area) while sales are down significantly, the months supply of housing units has increased dramatically. It is a remarkable turnaround from April 2005. The data comes from the MRIS.

27 comments:

  1. David,

    Do you know where one can find historical information on the number of homes sold in NOVA/DC over the last 10 years? A lot of realtors are claiming that with the time on the market increasing, we're getting back to a normal, healthy, market, that inventory levels are only now going back to historical norms.

    My curiosity lies in comparing actual sales volume and supply from historical data as well. If we're going to say that 5-7 months housing supply is normal, and revert back to 1998, 1999 monthly supply levels, we should also look at what the monthly housing sales volume was back then. I suspect that if you used the older sales volumes with today's inventory numbers you'd see a much higher monthly inventory on the market - i.e. a much greater over supply.

    I found some numbers on MRIS that indicated NOVA had about 47K units sold in the first 6 months of 2001. I then looked at March 2006 totals for NOVA and saw 1867 transactions.

    http://www.mris.com/reports/stats/route.cfm

    When multiplied by 12 (approximation - I know this number fluctuates throughout the year) you only get about 22.5K units. That's a pretty big difference which leads me to believe I'm not comparing apples to apples.

    The comparison I'm after may shed light on the number of speculators in the market. (The additional volume above and beyond historical trends.)

    Thank you,
    My $0.02.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Right - once again, I ask, please show historical inventory numbers so we can put this in perspective. The fact that the inventory is higher now than it was during the very most breakneck period of real-estate buying in the region's history is unsuprising. How does this compare to more mundane times, say, from 1996-2003?

    ReplyDelete
  3. those inventory numbers won't last, soon it'll be DOUBLE.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Northern Virginia Bubble blogs shows inventory going back to 1997 and we are now well above those levels. Also, inventory is continuing to build. I don't know if this will pop or go flat for 15 years but it doesn't look good either way.

    NOVA Fence Sitter

    ReplyDelete
  5. My2cents - McEnearney Realtors has a graph that shows available listings in NoVa averaging 9,000 to 10,000 units from 1991 to 1997. Here is the link:

    http://www.mcenearney.com/tips/nova-marketwatch.php?brochure_id=22

    Virginiamls.com is now showing inventory of about 9,800 units for Alex, Fair, Arl, FC, and FX City (ie, excluding Pr. Will, Manass, and Loudoun).

    I too suspect that inventory will continue to balloon as the months pass. I could see August inventory being 50% higher than today.

    ReplyDelete
  6. john fontain - I'm not sure you are comparing apples to apples by excluding Prince William, Mannas, and Loundon. The realtor site you provide doesn't indicate which areas are included in their numbers.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thank you for the links. Time to do a little math...

    My $0.02.

    ReplyDelete
  8. anonymous 2:01, mcenearney defines NOVA as those counties that john fontain listed.

    Still relatively tight inventory in alexandria and arlington. I'd like those to jump up to 5 or 6 months inventory before I get excited about price declines. One thing I'm sure of is declines in the Landmark area and I 395 corridor.

    ReplyDelete
  9. haudi- patience, this isn't remotely close to being over, it took years to get here... the unwinding will be a painfully (for builders, specuvestors, realtors, brokers, banks) long process.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Guys, I don't mean to rain on your parade, but 4-5 months of inventory is still quite low by historical standards. In a normal market, there is usually 8-9 months of inventory. The past few years of < 1 month of inventory were truly an anomaly, but everyone knew that wasn't going to last. The rapid appreciation of the last few years may also be gone, but with only 4-5 months of inventory there is still plenty of room for prices to move up at a more sustainable pace.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "In a normal market, there is usually 8-9 months of inventory"

    6 months is generally considered the line between a buyer's and seller's market.

    The MAIN point of this post is to show the huge change in months of supply {since last year) in the declining housing market in N. Virginia

    ReplyDelete
  12. "The MAIN point of this post is to show the huge change in months of supply {since last year) in the declining housing market in N. Virginia"

    But if the MAIN point of your entire blog is that the market was at super-heated, unsustainable levels, why is the return of normalcy to the market being treated as big news?

    You WANT the "huge change" to happen, but the "huge change" so far has merely been a return of normalcy. Now you want it to degrade from being normal into a patently unhealthy state, correct?

    bryce

    ReplyDelete
  13. "Never before have so many Americans gone so deeply into debt so willingly," writes Michael Hudson, author and professor of economics at the University of Missouri-Kansas City.

    "Irrational exuberance and Froth" were mere euphemisms for the state-of-the-housing-bubble.One has to shudder at the thought of what is yet to come!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Some people don't seem to understand that when you throw a ball up into the air it decelerates the whole way up, stops briefly, then it slowly starts accelerating back to earth.

    The ball is just beginning to return to earth.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Now I've seen everything; someone is literally applying the laws of physics to the residental housing market in the United States.

    "Some people don't seem to understand that when you throw a ball up into the air..."

    Some people don't understand that the molecular structures of fluids and gasses are less compact than are the structures of solid masses; or that all the molecular ingredients for water on this planet were delivered here by metorites eons ago, and that these things combined mean that you should invest in commodities and open a 3 month CD at Citibank.

    bryce

    (E=MC2 = Buy pork belly futures!) LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  16. The Stockton Record:

    "'Everyone says: 'It's so beautiful. It's gorgeous. I love your house,' Marcia said. 'Then they leave.'"

    Jerkstore

    ReplyDelete
  17. But the ball metaphor does not work-- when you throw up a ball, it does not shoot up, slow down, and then continue upwards at a more moderated pace.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Bryce - give it up. It's embarrassing even to read your rationalizations. The jig is up, dude.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I'm not rationalizing anything "van housing blogger". I'm having a good time running circles around the doom and gloom cheerleaders.

    You and others are so obtuse that you cannot see that I'm *not* arguing against a significant retraction in the housing market. I'm simply enjoying the fact that you are obtuse. (I know, I know, I have "issues", but being dense isn't one of them)

    I can see why and how you'd be embarrassed VHB. If your IQ were a few points higher you'd likely not feel that way.

    bryce

    ReplyDelete
  20. I'm sure that once spring selling season begins these inventories will start to decrease. When does spring selling season start...August right?

    ReplyDelete
  21. The interesting thing about these numbers is that they offer a good counterpoint to one of the bubble defenders' recent arguments: that there is a bubble in DC area condos, but not SFHs. At least in Nova, that chart shows an increasing number of SFHs as well.

    In the Silver Spring/Wheaton area, it certainly seems like there are a huge number of SFHs for sale. Many of these homes are very old and probably need major renovations of pipes and roofs, even if everything else looks nice. But the price does not reflect that, IMHO.

    A Redskins fan

    ReplyDelete
  22. Bryce, buddy

    - It happens all the time that healthy, well adjusted people need to tell others they're having a good time "running circles" around others.

    Then throw a few insults regarding IQ around, underlining their well-adjustedness.

    All the best people I know do that on a regular basis. hehehehehehe .....
    Is that level 9 or 10 on Maslow's hierarchy? BWAHAHAHAHAH !!!!

    ReplyDelete
  23. I made a prediction about someone's future behavior ... please don't let me down.

    ReplyDelete
  24. >> When does spring selling season start...August right?

    Phhthththththththhh
    cough sputter ack sputter glub glub sputter ACK!!!

    Yuck what a mess.
    You owe me a new keyboard.

    ReplyDelete
  25. hey, I said "I have issues". Did you not catch that?

    I know. And I do enjoy running circles around people. :-) (That is one of my issues)

    So the fact that you think you are calling me out on something that I freely admit to is kinda "superflous", don't you think? hehehehehe

    bryce

    ReplyDelete
  26. Anonymous 5:42am said
    "The interesting thing about these numbers is that they offer a good counterpoint to one of the bubble defenders' recent arguments: that there is a bubble in DC area condos, but not SFHs. At least in Nova, that chart shows an increasing number of SFHs as well."

    I sort of agree. My sense is that we're more likely to see actual price declines in outlying properties and condos (everywhere) and that close-in SFHs will have more sticking power.

    These numbers support your view that the market is slowing everywhere, but also support my view that within the market different segments will not necessarily move together.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Condos in the city aren't going to decline - they're affordable to the people who need them and belong in them: yuppies.

    ReplyDelete